The important conversation of the HMS R3 effort is also happening worldwide. We will use this resource to highlight recent literature and feature other organizations engaged in the global R3 discussion.
Recommendations regarding R3 Frameworks
-
National Academy of Sciences (NAS) Report on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2019)The important conversation of this committee is also happening nationwide, and worldwide. The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) Report on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (2019) is an evidence-based consensus assessment developed by the NAS Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In particular, the discussions of Sections 4, 6, and 7 review the prevalence of non-reproducibility, non-transparency, non-replicability, and related challenges in the sciences. These are common hurdles. The report sections noted also include some thoughtful discourse on tools and resources that might help to address these challenges.
-
Research Culture: Framework for advancing rigorous research
Koroshetz et al. 2020A recent article from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) published in eLife (Koroshetz et al. 2020) regarding the need for a shift in the culture of scientific practice, including concrete frameworks for consideration from a broad group of stakeholders (and colleagues) in various institutional settings. For additional information on this work, please visit the NINDS site on developing Rigor Champions and Resources.
Organizations engaged in R3 efforts
-
NIH Research Rigor and Reproducibility
The NIH Research Rigor Web resource outlining their efforts to enhance rigor and reproducibility in scientific research
-
The UK Reproducibility Network (UKRN)
The UKRN is a multi-institutional effort across the UK supporting robust and rigorous research, including the development of resources and training activities.